<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FraudRating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fraudrating.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fraudrating.com</link>
	<description>Ecommerce Fraud Detection &#38; Prevention Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Online Fraud Complaints Up 33% in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/11/01/online-fraud-complaints-up-33-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/11/01/online-fraud-complaints-up-33-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sdaniels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a Washington Post Article in April 2009, the FBI has stated that online fraud complaints was up 33% in 2008.
Some 275,284 complaints were filed last year with the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), a partnership between the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center. In 2007, the IC3 received 206,844 complaints.
The area [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a title="FBI: Internet Fraud Rates Rose 33% Last Year" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/04/fbi_internet_fraud_rates_rose.html?wprss=securityfix" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/04/fbi_internet_fraud_rates_rose.html?wprss=securityfix&amp;referer=');">Washington Post Article</a> in April 2009, the FBI has stated that online fraud complaints was up 33% in 2008.</p>
<p>Some 275,284 complaints were filed last year with the <a href="http://www.ic3.gov/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ic3.gov/?referer=');">Internet Crime Complaint Center</a> (IC3), a partnership between the FBI and the <a href="http://www.nw3c.org/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nw3c.org/?referer=');">National White Collar Crime Center</a>. In 2007, the IC3 received 206,844 complaints.</p>
<p>The area of biggest concern, and one we are concerned with at FraudRating, is the delivery of Non-delivery services.</p>
<p>Please review the following chart:<br />
<img src="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/assets_c/2009/04/ic32009-thumb-420x242.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>This biggest area of fraud complaints is in the Non-Delivery of services.  Our product is targeted at this specific problem.  Please get on our contact list to learn more about our product, if you are interested in an anti-fraud solution in this market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/11/01/online-fraud-complaints-up-33-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Red Flags Rule Go Into Effect November 1</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/10/23/the-red-flags-rule-go-into-effect-november-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/10/23/the-red-flags-rule-go-into-effect-november-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sdaniels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Red Flags Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Flag Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red flags rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog entry is the beginning of a series of articles written by members of the FraudRating team about the Red Flag Rules.  In addition to developing a product, we believe that we are going to be a source of education for Businesses, Government and the Education market.  Please take note of these articles, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog entry is the beginning of a series of articles written by members of the FraudRating team about the Red Flag Rules.  In addition to developing a product, we believe that we are going to be a source of education for Businesses, Government and the Education market.  Please take note of these articles, as we explain how and why our product will fit into your Red Flag Rules for your website.</p>
<p>At the FTC website you can read about the Red Flag Rules: <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm?referer=');">http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm</a></p>
<p>The FTC has some keys questions about the Red Flag Rules, such as:</p>
<p>A.  <a title="General Questions about the red flags rule" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#A" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm_A?referer=');">General Questions About the Red Flags Rule</a><br />
B. <a title="Who's Covered by the red flags rule?" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#B" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm_B?referer=');"> Who’s Covered by the Red Flags Rule?</a><br />
C.  <a title="The red flags rule and government agencies, non-profit organizations and schools" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#C" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm_C?referer=');">The Red Flags Rule and Government Agencies, Non-Profit Organizations, and Schools</a><br />
D.  <a title="Designing your identity theft prevention program" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#D" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm_D?referer=');">Designing Your Identity Theft Prevention Program</a><br />
E.  <a title="Red Flags Rule Compliance And Enforcement" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#E" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm_E?referer=');">Red Flags Rule Compliance and Enforcement</a></p>
<p><a title="The Red Flags Rule" href="http://www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule?referer=');">The Red Flags Rule</a> (this time around) impact only “financial institutions” and “creditors&#8221; according this FTC website.  But this is really a hazy type of grouping.  What is a creditor?  Don&#8217;t many companies basically finance the person who buys their service&#8230; This would make them a creditor and that is very broad according to this website.  That would be the concept of giving out credit, like in a Saas (Software As A Service).  So it would be easy to understand <a title="The Red Flags Rule" href="http://www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule?referer=');">The Red Flags Rule</a> eventually being extended to many other industries.</p>
<p>If you look at the <a title="Red Flag Rules" href="http://www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule?referer=');">guide book here</a>, you will find a list of the <a title="The Red Flags Rule" href="http://www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule?referer=');">The Red Flags Rule</a> and all the reasons why you need to meet these requirements.  Our goal at <a title="FraudRating" href="../">FraudRating</a> is to try to come up with part of the automation of these rules through our new service, which is about to be released.</p>
<p>This blog is going to have a series of articles about how to use the <a title="FraudRating" href="http://www.fraudrating.com">FraudRating</a> system as part of implementing your <a title="The Red Flags Rule" href="http://www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule?referer=');">The Red Flags Rule</a>.  This software is going to be available for any type of website, including service delivery companies who have a website and physical ecommerce companies who shop products.  If you are working at a government or educational website that registers or sells information or creates some type of transaction, the FraudRating Manager will be the appropriate product for you to try out.</p>
<p>There is a beta test that is just beginning with this product.   Please contact us if you are interested in being a beta tester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/10/23/the-red-flags-rule-go-into-effect-november-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FraudRating Beta Getting Closer</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/09/24/fraudrating-beta-getting-closer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/09/24/fraudrating-beta-getting-closer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sdaniels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FraudRating Beta Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud rating beta test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FraudRating, an easy to implement, cost effective anti fraud solution for card not present and other online ecommerce providers is close to being ready to be tested.  Please contact us at &#115;&#97;&#108;&#101;&#115;&#64;&#102;r&#97;&#117;&#100;r&#97;&#116;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109; if you are interested in signing up for our Beta Test program. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FraudRating, an easy to implement, cost effective anti fraud solution for card not present and other online ecommerce providers is close to being ready to be tested.  Please contact us at <a href="mailto:&#115;&#97;&#108;&#101;&#115;&#64;&#102;&#114;&#97;&#117;&#100;r&#97;&#116;i&#110;g.&#99;om">&#115;&#97;&#108;&#101;&#115;&#64;&#102;r&#97;&#117;&#100;r&#97;&#116;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;</a> if you are interested in signing up for our Beta Test program. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/09/24/fraudrating-beta-getting-closer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMO study: Marketers fear increase in brand infection</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/cmo-study-marketers-fear-increase-in-brand-infection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/cmo-study-marketers-fear-increase-in-brand-infection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apparel Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Hijackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMO Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online retail sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber squatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grey market knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MarkMonitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection From Brand Infection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In times of a slow economy, marketers see a lot of danger for brand integrity by fakes, frauds and infringements. The Chief Marketing Office (CMO) Council asked in a global audit of 306 marketers, sponsored by MarkMonitor, how marketers view threats to online and offline brand attacks. The results reveal that top marketers see online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In times of a slow economy, marketers see a lot of danger for brand integrity by fakes, frauds and infringements. The </span><a href="http://www.cmocouncil.org/" target="blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cmocouncil.org/?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Chief Marketing Office (CMO) Council</span></span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> asked in a global audit of 306 marketers, sponsored by </span><a href="http://www.markmonitor.com/" target="blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.markmonitor.com/?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">MarkMonitor</span></span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">, how marketers view threats to online and offline brand attacks. The results reveal that top marketers see online threats heating up but still struggle to understand, monitor and measure the impact of the increased sophistication of brand hijackers and product knock-offs on consumer trust and confidence. The good point is: they plan to increase spending on brand protection. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The study ‚Äú</span><a href="http://www.cmocouncil.org/resources/form_protection.asp" target="blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cmocouncil.org/resources/form_protection.asp?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Protection From Brand Infection</span></span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">‚Äù shows that marketers are reporting a greater number of incidents or fraud online than offline. In terms of chief vulnerability online (29.5%) has surpassed offline (22.6%) already. The brand value, trust, integrity and reputation is being eroded and damaged, reply the study respondents. The main problems companies are fighting grey market knock-offs, phishing attacks, cyber squatting, email scams, trademark abuse, copyright and patent infringements.<br style="mso-special-character: line-break;" /><br style="mso-special-character: line-break;" /></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><strong>Key findings of the Protection from Brand Infection study</strong><br />
</span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">- The top six market segments with the highest prevalence of abuse are digital media, luxury goods, software, footwear and apparel and Internet e-commerce (tied), and consumer electronics.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">- 30.3% said their company has a specialized brand protection group with another 17% choosing to outsource those efforts with a third party provider or leaving it up to their industry trade organization.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">- 27.4% reported they spend less than $100,000 on brand protection annually and the same number reported they have no budget allocations. Another 29.1% report they don‚Äôt know. 9.8 percent say they‚Äôre spending more than $500,000 while 2.7% say they‚Äôre spending more than $5 million.</span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><br />
- The value and integrity of brand assets suffered the greatest impact from counterfeit products, knock-offs or online brand hijackings, with 41.2 percent of marketers rating this highest followed by 35% blaming it for undermining revenue and margins and 26.7 percent saying the activities raised unnecessary customer concerns and anxieties.</span></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a title="Study Shows that Marketers Fear Online Fraud (to their Brands) Moreso than Offline Fraud" href="http://www.thestrategyweb.com/cmo-study-marketers-fear-increase-in-brand-infection" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.thestrategyweb.com/cmo-study-marketers-fear-increase-in-brand-infection?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-size: small;">http://www.thestrategyweb.com/cmo-study-marketers-fear-increase-in-brand-infection</span></span></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/cmo-study-marketers-fear-increase-in-brand-infection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Reduce E-Commerce Fraud And Fraud-Related Costs In A Challenging Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/how-to-reduce-e-commerce-fraud-and-fraud-related-costs-in-a-challenging-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/how-to-reduce-e-commerce-fraud-and-fraud-related-costs-in-a-challenging-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit Card Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manual Order Verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online retail sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping fears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Commerce fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosted options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manual review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online credit card fraud prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order rejection rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourced options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retailers are realizing that the level of e-commerce fraud losses that they have considered &#8220;acceptable&#8221; in the past is not acceptable at all. That&#8217;s especially true in the current economic environment. For many merchants, e-commerce sales are a bright spot right now and they are doing everything possible to maximize online revenues and improve the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">Retailers are realizing that the level of e-commerce fraud losses that they have considered &#8220;acceptable&#8221; in the past is not acceptable at all. That&#8217;s especially true in the current economic environment. For many merchants, e-commerce sales are a bright spot right now and they are doing everything possible to maximize online revenues and improve the web shopping experience for consumers. But at the same time, they have to make more efficient use of limited resources. They have to do more with less and eliminate operational costs. They are focused on initiatives that have quick ROI. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">Online credit card fraud prevention is a critical area to address because they can achieve significant cost reductions almost immediately. It&#8217;s about more than just reducing fraud rates ‚Äì it&#8217;s about reducing manual review and order rejection rates and increasing analysts&#8217; productivity and accuracy. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">Several things. First, they are strengthening their defenses by applying more automation and new tools and technologies in their fraud prevention programs. Second, they are moving away from &#8220;piecemeal&#8221; solutions and taking an integrated, platform-based approach that is quicker to implement and provides results in a matter of weeks. Third, they are empowering their fraud prevention teams to take control of the process. Because criminals are always inventing new scams, merchants have to be fast and nimble at fighting fraud. That means choosing flexible solutions that aren&#8217;t dependent on any single anti-fraud technology and that can be easily modified without waiting for help from an IT department. Additionally, they are looking at hosted and outsourced options in order to address capacity, fixed-cost and personnel issues.<br />
</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><a title="Merchants Doing Everything Possible to Maximize Online Revenue while Improving Customers Web Shopping Experience" href="http://www.retailsolutionsonline.com/article.mvc/How-To-Reduce-E-Commerce-Fraud-And-0002?VNETCOOKIE=NO" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.retailsolutionsonline.com/article.mvc/How-To-Reduce-E-Commerce-Fraud-And-0002?VNETCOOKIE=NO&amp;referer=');">http://www.retailsolutionsonline.com/article.mvc/How-To-Reduce-E-Commerce-Fraud-And-0002?VNETCOOKIE=NO</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/how-to-reduce-e-commerce-fraud-and-fraud-related-costs-in-a-challenging-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Magic Bullet To Stop Online Card Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/no-magic-bullet-to-stop-online-card-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/no-magic-bullet-to-stop-online-card-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manual Order Verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping fears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet revolution has triggered a massive influx of eCommerce transactions &#8212; one of the fastest growing segments of transactions today. However, a recent study from Gartner reveals that consumers are changing their online behaviour due to concerns about the safety of their personal data.¬†15% of those surveyed have stopped shopping online altogether, such are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span class="intro1"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt;">The Internet revolution has triggered a massive influx of eCommerce transactions &#8212; one of the fastest growing segments of transactions today. However, a recent study from Gartner reveals that consumers are changing their online behaviour due to concerns about the safety of their personal data.¬†15% of those surveyed have stopped shopping online altogether, such are their concerns. The biggest fraud-prevention mistake eCommerce merchants usually make is to manually review every single order to look for signs of fraud. We caught up with Dr. Akif Khan, head, client and technical services, CyberSource to know more about online card fraud.</span></span><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><a title="CyberSource's Dr. Akif Khan Talks about the Future of Online Card Fraud" href="http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/34416/news.htm" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.efytimes.com/efytimes/34416/news.htm?referer=');">http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/34416/news.htm</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/no-magic-bullet-to-stop-online-card-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Startup Takes New Spin On Online Fraud Detection</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/startup-takes-new-spin-on-online-fraud-detection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/startup-takes-new-spin-on-online-fraud-detection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Captcha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[41st Parameter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HumanaPresent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pramana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Sehgal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A security startup is preparing to emerge from stealth mode with a new technology that detects in real-time whether an online user or member of a social network is legitimate &#8212; and not a bot, automated tool, or criminal performing financial or other online fraud. 
¬†
Pramana, which will officially launch in July, has developed what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">A security startup is preparing to emerge from stealth mode with a new technology that detects in real-time whether an online user or member of a social network is legitimate &#8212; and not a bot, automated tool, or criminal performing financial or other online fraud. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">¬†</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><a href="http://www.pramana.com/" target="new" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pramana.com/?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">Pramana</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">, which will officially launch in July, has developed what it calls HumanPresent, a technology spun off from research at Georgia Tech that catches online fraud in action, real-time, using a dynamic method of identifying human behavior anomalies while at the same time preventing the fraudsters from detecting that they&#8217;re being watched. &#8220;We are looking at real-time behavior, but we never disclose our schemes or strategies&#8230;We are observing inputs and collecting data, and we are never fixed on one [approach]. We deploy different collection mechanism strategies on different pages to evade detection, as well as evolve our system with new strategies,&#8221; says Sanjay Sehgal, CEO of Pramana, who is keeping the details of the inner workings of HumanPresent close to the vest so as not to tip off the bad guys. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">¬†</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">HumanPresent doesn&#8217;t rely on blacklists of botnet IP addresses, nor does it address bot activity at the network level like other organizations that sell antibotnet products and services do, according to Sehgal. &#8220;We are in the abuse and fraud detection and prevention part of the security space, not network security,&#8221; he says. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">In addition, Pramana&#8217;s technology doesn&#8217;t use device fingerprinting to identify a bot or rogue activity like other online fraud firms, such as </span><a href="http://www.iovation.com/" target="new" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.iovation.com/?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">Iovation</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> and </span><a href="http://www.the41st.com/" target="new" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.the41st.com/?referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">41st Parameter</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">. It uses special APIs placed on customers&#8217; Web pages that then communicate back to the HumanPresent server. The tool monitors and validates an entire user session during a transaction, including attempts to fake the CAPTCHA process. HumanPresent alerts the online retailer, financial institution, or social network operator, for example, within 10 milliseconds of finding bot or other online fraud activity.</p>
<p></span></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><a title="Pramana's Online Fraud Detection Technology to Launch in July 2009" href="http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/attacks/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217300733" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/attacks/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217300733&amp;referer=');">http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/attacks/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217300733</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/startup-takes-new-spin-on-online-fraud-detection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New module: Anatoa fraud and scam detection</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/new-module-anatoa-fraud-and-scam-detection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/new-module-anatoa-fraud-and-scam-detection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigerian 419 scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anatoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drupal Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual webmasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online fraud detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Univalence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebServices technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Univalence Ltd, a London based company established in 2008, is today launching a Drupal module for Anatoa, the new online fraud detection service directed at membership based websites run by individual webmasters as well as small and medium companies.
The service addresses both so-called profile scam and abusive members, both major reasons for membership based websites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; margin: 0.2in 0in 12pt; line-height: 16.2pt;"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #003150; font-family: Verdana;">Univalence Ltd, a London based company established in 2008, is today launching a Drupal module for Anatoa, the new online fraud detection service directed at membership based websites run by individual webmasters as well as small and medium companies.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; margin: 0.2in 0in 12pt; line-height: 16.2pt;"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #003150; font-family: Verdana;">The service addresses both so-called profile scam and abusive members, both major reasons for membership based websites not reaching their full potential.¬† </span><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #003150; font-family: Verdana;">The typical example of profile scam is the &#8220;Nigerian 419 scam&#8221;, in which organised fraudsters, often based in West Africa, use promises of large amounts of money to defraud people they contact on the Internet.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; margin: 0.2in 0in 12pt; line-height: 16.2pt;"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #003150; font-family: Verdana;">Anatoa provides a service for detection and automated detection of these fraudsters, using WebServices technology and ready-made plugins for 20 of the most popular software packages used by websites today. By combining input from all members of the service, new fraudsters are quickly detected and prevented from conducting their activity on all members&#8217; websites. The service is free for most websites, with charging models coming into account for those with a large member base.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; margin: 0.2in 0in 12pt; line-height: 16.2pt;"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: #003150; font-family: Verdana;">Websites that install the module can expect immediate benefits by preventing fraudsters from destroying their growth potential, as well as cleaning up their existing membership database. Once active members, they can display Anatoa&#8217;s membership logo on their member sign-up form as a further deterrent.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><a title="Univalence Launches Drupal Module for New Online Fraud Detection Service, Anatoa" href="http://drupal.org/node/455314" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/drupal.org/node/455314?referer=');">http://drupal.org/node/455314</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/new-module-anatoa-fraud-and-scam-detection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>APWG and IEEE Send Out Call For Papers for the Fourth Annual 2009 eCrime Researchers Summit</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/apwg-and-ieee-send-out-call-for-papers-for-the-fourth-annual-2009-ecrime-researchers-summit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/apwg-and-ieee-send-out-call-for-papers-for-the-fourth-annual-2009-ecrime-researchers-summit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[APWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic evidence handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The APWG and IEEE are inviting papers and research from electronic crime researchers for the fourth annual eCrime Researchers Summit (eCRS), the world‚Äôs only peer-reviewed research conference dedicated to electronic crime research, scheduled to be held in Tacoma, WA on October 20 and 21 this year, in collaboration with the University of Washington, Tacoma. 

eCRS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;">The </span><a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.antiphishing.org%2F&amp;esheet=5956071&amp;lan=en_US&amp;anchor=APWG&amp;index=1" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink_amp_url=http_3A_2F_2Fwww.antiphishing.org_2F_amp_esheet=5956071_amp_lan=en_US_amp_anchor=APWG_amp_index=1&amp;referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">APWG</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;"> and </span><a href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee.org&amp;esheet=5956071&amp;lan=en_US&amp;anchor=IEEE&amp;index=2" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink_amp_url=http_3A_2F_2Fwww.ieee.org_amp_esheet=5956071_amp_lan=en_US_amp_anchor=IEEE_amp_index=2&amp;referer=');"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">IEEE</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> are inviting papers and research from electronic crime researchers for the fourth annual eCrime Researchers Summit (eCRS), the world‚Äôs only peer-reviewed research conference dedicated to electronic crime research, scheduled to be held in Tacoma, WA on October 20 and 21 this year, in collaboration with the University of Washington, Tacoma. </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #000000;"></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;">eCRS Chair Randal Vaughn said, &#8220;eCRS, which was founded four years ago by APWG and which marks its second year of IEEE Standards Group technical sponsorship, offers a unique opportunity for those in the academic, commercial, and government communities to collaborate towards improving each other&#8217;s abilities to understand and counter the forces behind electronic crime.&#8221; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;">Research papers are invited within a wide variety topic spaces joined by the common theme of investigating the criminological aspects of electronic security, including phishing, rogue anti-virus programs, crimeware, click-fraud, botnets, delivery techniques, detection avoidance, user interface design as well as forensic subjects such as electronic evidence handling. </span></p>
<p>¬†</p>
<p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><a title="Electronic Crime Researchers Invited to Submit Papers in Advance of eCrime Researchers Summit" href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090504006314&amp;newsLang=en" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view_amp_newsId=20090504006314_amp_newsLang=en&amp;referer=');">http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090504006314&amp;newsLang=en</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/apwg-and-ieee-send-out-call-for-papers-for-the-fourth-annual-2009-ecrime-researchers-summit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fingerprinting Protects Privacy in Fighting Online Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/fingerprinting-protects-privacy-in-fighting-online-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/fingerprinting-protects-privacy-in-fighting-online-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mtaylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Device Fingerprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Banking Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device fingerprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudrating.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been some recent discussion in different articles regarding whether or not device identification, also referred to as device fingerprinting, when used to fight online fraud, constitutes a violation of privacy. The topic came up recently at a panel at RSA on the Benefits and Dangers of Device Fingerprinting. The essence of the discussion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">There has been some recent discussion in different articles regarding whether or not device identification, also referred to as device fingerprinting, when used to fight online fraud, constitutes a violation of privacy. The topic came up recently at a panel at RSA on the Benefits and Dangers of Device Fingerprinting. The essence of the discussion is that device fingerprinting provides significant benefits for online businesses in both providing an additional factor for authentication, as is used by many online banks, and is also beneficial for fighting fraud by identifying computers that have been used in the past for fraudulent activities and stopping future transactions from those systems.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 7.5pt 0pt 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;">¬†</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">The reality is that device fingerprinting fraud prevention systems provide some of the only fraud management tools to online businesses that don‚Äôt rely heavily on personally identifiable information. Instead of decrying privacy violations, privacy advocates should be looking to embrace systems that achieve the purpose of reducing online fraud while still protecting the privacy of good online users.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><a title="Device Fingerprinting Helps Reduce Online Fraud While Protecting the Privacy of Good Online Users" href="http://blog.iovation.com/2009/05/04/device-fingerprinting-protects-privacy-in-fighting-online-fraud/" target="_self" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.iovation.com/2009/05/04/device-fingerprinting-protects-privacy-in-fighting-online-fraud/?referer=');">http://blog.iovation.com/2009/05/04/device-fingerprinting-protects-privacy-in-fighting-online-fraud/</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudrating.com/2009/05/11/fingerprinting-protects-privacy-in-fighting-online-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

